Revival of Brock's Operation for Intermediary Palliation of Fallot's Tetralogy in Children Anatomically Unsuitable for One-Stage Total Correction of the Anomaly: Interim Results of Two Cases.

One-stage total correction is known to be anatomically unsuitable for correcting tetralogy of fallot (TOF) in a certain proportion of children. Surgeons are thus faced with dilemmas regarding which preliminary operation for the anomaly to do first. Brock's primary postulation suggests that pulmonary trunk and annulus enlargement leading to the correction of the outflow obstruction will favor the subsequent total correction. In line with this, the current article presents two patients who were 6 months and 5 years old. The first patient underwent primary Brock's operation while the second patient had a blocked modified Blalock-Taussig's shunt (MBTS) done off-pump. Following the discontinuation of anti-platelet medications, the MBTS blocked and the patient was subsequently considered for secondary Brock's operation. The outcome of both procedures involved the patients' discharge with uneventful hospital stays and regular follow-ups at specified intervals. Thus, Brock's operation is an excellent preliminary palliative procedure for one-stage total correction of TOF. There is a need to revive 'Brock's procedure' for patients with TOF and poor pulmonary artery anatomy as the procedure of choice. The first direct intra-cardiac operation aimed at directly addressing the pathological anatomy on its Diamond Jubilee Year.

A review of the results from a patient experience survey of the palliative radiotherapy bone metastases service

Introduction:A patient experience survey was undertaken as part of the role of the Macmillan Consultant Therapy Radiographer for the bone and brain metastases patients to inform future development of the service.Method:A questionnaire was developed and approved by the Trust's local Questionnaire, Interview and Survey Group to survey the experiences and satisfaction of the service including the informed consent process, radiotherapy appointments and overall experience and satisfaction. The survey used qualitative and quantitative methods, including Likert Scales and free comment boxes. The responses were analysed by counting the frequency of each response and identifying any themes in free text responses.Results:Most patients were satisfied with the consent process with 1/36 patients reporting a lack of understandable information and 4/36 wanting more side effect information. The option of plan and treat was a preference of 53% of patients due to travelling back and forth to the centre;however, only 6% stated that they wanted two separate appointments. Ninety-four percent of patients felt that they had complete confidence and trust in the professional who consented them and 86% did not feel fully involved in the decision-making process. Overall, the service was rated as 10/10 by 61% of patients (n = 36).Conclusions:The patients surveyed were satisfied with their experience of the Palliative Radiotherapy Service;however, it needs to be developed further to meet the needs and expectations of the service users.

The Role and Experiences of Social Workers in Hospices during the Peak of the Covid-19 Pandemic

Background: The aim of the present article is to inform the reader about how social workers in hospices experienced the COVID-19 pandemic. Conclusion: We draw on the conclusions of qualitative research conducted with six respondents from across Slovakia.The research results were processed into a paradigmatic model of grounded theory, where "Personal experience of the pandemic" comes to the fore as a central category.

Real-World Patterns and Decision Drivers of Radiotherapy for Lung Cancer Patients in Romania: RADIO-NET Study Results.

Radiotherapy (RT) plays a crucial role in all stages of lung cancer. Data on recent real-world RT patterns and main drivers of RT decisions in lung cancer in Romania is scarce; we aimed to address these knowledge gaps through this physician-led medical chart review in 16 RT centers across the country. Consecutive patients with lung cancer receiving RT as part of their disease management between May-October 2019 (pre-COVID-19 pandemic) were included. Descriptive statistics were generated for all variables. This cohort included 422 patients: median age 63 years, males 76%, stages I-II 6%, III 43%, IV 50%, mostly adeno- and squamous cell carcinoma (76%), ECOG 0-1 50% at the time of RT. Curative intent RT was used in 36% of cases, palliative RT in 64%. Delays were reported in 13% of patients, mostly due to machine breakdown (67%). Most acute reported RT toxicity was esophagitis (19%). Multiple disease-, patient-, physician- and context-related drivers counted in the decision-making process. This is the first detailed analysis of RT use in lung cancer in Romania. Palliative RT still dominates the landscape. Earlier diagnosis, coordinated multidisciplinary strategies, and the true impact of the multimodal treatments on survival are strongly needed to improve lung cancer outcomes.

What Did the Pandemic Teach Us About Palliative Radiation in Head and Neck Cancer?

Objective: To assess the feasibility and efficacy of palliative radiotherapy dose regimens for patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer. Methods: Fifty patients of previously untreated, inoperable, stage IVA and IVB squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, deemed unfit for radical treatment, were included in the study from May 2020 to June 2020. Two palliative radiotherapy regimens were used. First was a single fraction radiation with 8 Gy for patients with limited life expectancy and poor performance status, which was repeated after 4 weeks in case of good symptom relief. The second regimen was used for patients with good performance status and consisted of fractionated radiation with 30 Gy in 10 fractions over 2 weeks, which was followed by supplementary radiation with 25 Gy in 10 fractions over 2 weeks in patients with good symptomatic response at 2 weeks. Symptoms were assessed at baseline and at the end of 4 weeks after treatment completion using the numerical rating score. Patients were followed up for a median of 4.5 months and assessed for symptom control and overall survival. Results: Forty-eight patients completed treatment and were included for analysis. Of the 24 patients who received single fraction radiation, 13 (54.2%) were given the second dose. Improvement in pain and dysphagia were reported in 57.9% and 60% patients, respectively. A total of 55.5% noted decrease in size of the neck node. Twenty-four patients received fractionated radiation and 15 (62.5%) were given the second course after 2 weeks. Relief in pain and dysphagia was reported in 68.2% and 63.6% patients, respectively. There were no grade 3/4 toxicities. Symptom control lasted for at least 3 months in 30% of the patients who received single fraction radiation and 54.2% of the patients who received fractionated radiation. The estimated 6-month overall survival of the entire cohort was 51.4%. Conclusion: Judicious use of palliative radiation in advanced incurable head and neck cancers provides effective and durable symptom relief and should be used after careful consideration of patient prognosis, logistics of treatment, and goals of care.

Palliative radiotherapy indications during the COVID-19 pandemic and in future complex logistic settings: the NORMALITY model.

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic has challenged healthcare systems worldwide over the last few months, and it continues to do so. Although some restrictions are being removed, it is not certain when the pandemic is going to be definitively over. Pandemics can be seen as a highly complex logistic scenario. From this perspective, some of the indications provided for palliative radiotherapy (PRT) during the COVID-19 pandemic could be maintained in the future in settings that limit the possibility of patients achieving symptom relief by radiotherapy. This paper has two aims: (1) to provide a summary of the indications for PRT during the COVID-19 pandemic; since some indications can differ slightly, and to avoid any possible contradictions, an expert panel composed of the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO) and the Palliative Care and Supportive Therapies Working Group (AIRO-palliative) voted by consensus on the summary; (2) to introduce a clinical care model for PRT [endorsed by AIRO and by a spontaneous Italian collaborative network for PRT named "La Rete del Sollievo" ("The Net of Relief")]. The proposed model, denoted "No cOmpRoMise on quality of life by pALliative radiotherapy" (NORMALITY), is based on an AIRO-palliative consensus-based list of clinical indications for PRT and on practical suggestions regarding the management of patients potentially suitable for PRT but dealing with highly complex logistics scenarios (similar to the ongoing logistics limits due to COVID-19). MATERIAL AND METHODS: First, a summary of the available literature guidelines for PRT published during the COVID-19 pandemic was prepared. A systematic literature search based on the PRISMA approach was performed to retrieve the available literature reporting guideline indications fully or partially focused on PRT. Tables reporting each addressed clinical presentation and respective literature indications were prepared and distributed into two main groups: palliative emergencies and palliative non-emergencies. These summaries were voted in by consensus by selected members of the AIRO and AIRO-palliative panels. Second, based on the summary for palliative indications during the COVID-19 pandemic, a clinical care model to facilitate recruitment and delivery of PRT to patients in complex logistic scenarios was proposed. The summary tables were critically integrated and shuffled according to clinical presentations and then voted on in a second consensus round. Along with the adapted guideline indications, some methods of performing the first triage of patients and facilitating a teleconsultation preliminary to the first in-person visit were developed. RESULTS: After the revision of 161 documents, 13 papers were selected for analysis. From the papers, 19 clinical presentation items were collected; in total, 61 question items were extracted and voted on (i.e., for each presentation, more than one indication was provided from the literature). Two tables summarizing the PRT indications during the COVID-19 pandemic available from the literature (PRT COVID-19 summary tables) were developed: palliative emergencies and palliative non-emergencies. The consensus of the vote by the AIRO panel for the PRT COVID-19 summary was reached. The PRT COVID-19 summary tables for palliative emergencies and palliative non-emergencies were adapted for clinical presentations possibly associated with patients in complex clinical scenarios other than the COVID-19 pandemic. The two new indication tables (i.e., "Normality model of PRT indications") for both palliative emergencies and palliative non-emergencies were voted on in a second consensus round. The consensus rate was reached and strong. Written forms facilitating two levels of teleconsultation (triage and remote visits) were also developed, both in English and in Italian, to evaluate the patients for possible indications for PRT before scheduling clinical visits. CONCLUSION: We provide a comprehensive summary of the literature guideline indications for PRT during COVID-19 pandemic. We also propose a clinical care model including clinical indications and written forms facilitating two levels of teleconsultation (triage and remote visits) to evaluate the patients for indications of PRT before scheduling clinical visits. The normality model could facilitate the provision of PRT to patients in future complex logistic scenarios.

Malignant Bowel Obstruction in the Time of the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Regardless of the anatomic site of malignant bowel obstruction leading to the need for palliative intervention, decisions must consider the natural history of the disease, the availability and success of nonsurgical treatments, the individual patient's symptom severity, goals, preferences, quality, and expectancy of life. Therapy for symptoms must remain flexible and individualized because the specific needs of the patient will change as disease progresses. Because strangulation is uncommon, malignant bowel obstruction is usually not a surgical emergency. There is usually time to proceed with deliberate and thoughtful decisions on how best to meet the needs and expectations of the individual patient and family. Providers must be well versed in both surgical and nonsurgical therapeutic options, the natural history of disease, and be active and compassionate providers to foster meaningful ongoing dialogue focused on excellent care even after cure is no longer possible. The palliative triangle not only allows patient, family, and surgeon to effectively utilize the full continuum of care that can be delivered, but also it supports end-of-life decisions when continuity in care matters most. Due to social distancing requirements, the dynamics of communication between patient, family, and surgeon have changed. Zoom, Skype, and FaceTime have become tools in our communication armamentarium.

COVID-19 and the elderly: insights into pathogenesis and clinical decision-making.

The elderly may represent a specific cluster of high-risk patients for developing COVID-19 with rapidly progressive clinical deterioration. Indeed, in older individuals, immunosenescence and comorbid disorders are more likely to promote viral-induced cytokine storm resulting in life-threatening respiratory failure and multisystemic involvement. Early diagnosis and individualized therapeutic management should be developed for elderly subjects based on personal medical history and polypharmacotherapy. Our review examines the pathogenesis and clinical implications of ageing in COVID-19 patients; finally, we discuss the evidence and controversies in the management in the long-stay residential care homes and aspects of end-of-life care for elderly patients with COVID-19.